Buyings Points!

As heard on the Czabecast, don't forget about when to "buy" 1/2 points!

NEVER do I buy "on or off" a 3! That means you don't buy a "3" (to either a 2.5 or 3.5), nor do you buy a 2.5 (or 3.5) ONTO "3".

When you buy "1/2" point, instead or risking -110 (to get 100), you now risk -120. Win and of course no difference!

HOWEVER, "on or off" the 3 and you pay either -130 or even -135! Just not worth it. If I'm laying that much juice, I'd rather move to $line, or just skip that game!

But, you DO buy if it's a 4, 6, or 7! Magic numbers (maybe a 10 or 14 too, but larger numbers I may shy away from).

Less obvious, is I NEVER "buy OFF a number", but only off the "0.5"!

Buying from a half to whole (say from 6.5 to 7), you are essentially trying to "buy" a loss into a tie, or push. But buying from a 7 to a 6.5, you are trying to "buy" a tie to a win. What's the difference? Part mental and part math.

Mental: I don't feel I need to "Buy" a tie into a win. Whatever. If it's a push, it's a push.

I DO like to avoid a LOSS by "buying" off the loss!

Math: no impact when play is a winner. But if you lose, you are risking an extra $10 (per $100). So consider it a separate $10 bet (from your original bet).

If the line is say 6.5 and you "BUY" the line to +7. When the game comes in on exactly 7, you have "bought" you way off that loss and instead got a push. So instead of a -$110 losse you get a push. I say your $10 risked on the buy, got you $110 return (economist, opportunity cost here). So you got an 11-1 return on that decision to buy.

If you buy a line of -7 down to -6.5, by same rational, if the game came in on exactly -7, your "buy" of -$10 bought you from a push to a WIN. The $10 netted you +$100, or a 10-1 return.

Sure, nothing wrong with a 10-1 return, but I say:

1. Clearly 11-1 is better than 10-1, and

2. Given that you may lose 50% of your bets, I think the habit of buying "off" whole numbers is just a way to end up risking -120 instead of -110, and I can't to that. But, I will avoid some losses when games come in on the common outcomes of -4, -6, -7 by risking the -120 to get a tie not a loss!

Plus, I figure I'm going to win anyway :-)

198 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

This week's pick was too easy!

On the Friday Premium Czabecast, Mr X said take GT UNDER their total in the first half. It went off at 23 or 23.5. They limped to a 19. Easy W. The theory is now 20-4-1 this season. Just ONE game

The Best NCAA plays of 2019!

College Basketball – Best theory of 2018-19 I released this to the “Insider Subscribers” prior to season, so the deal is I don’t say it on air or website until after season….or at least very late in y

The Dog and Over Theory: Explained

#roverandover #czabecast The Dog and Over is a "system" play, and not an "opinion", meaning I play it regardless of who the teams are or any "analysis" of outcome. Pretty much. It rarely applies in

© 2019 Just Call Me Mr X

THIS IS NOT A GAMBLING SITE. This site uses cookies. By continuing to access the website you are agreeing to out terms and conditions. The information on this site is for entertainment purposes only. cannot be held responsible or liable in any way for losses or damages of any kind incurred as a result of using this website,or as a result of using any website linked from this website. Please gamble responsibly and only where legal.

Site designed by Strata Associates